Lynch v. Does et al.
Screened claims include deliberate indifference to serious medical needs (HIV / Biktarvy), legal-mail interference, failure to protect, excessive force, equal protection, and retaliation.
Survived judicial screening
Defendants' attorney declined summary judgment due to material facts
HSA nurse admitted altering meds in violation of CDC and manufacturer guidelines
Eastern District of Arkansas · § 1983
I am seeking experienced civil-rights counsel to enter three related federal matters arising from confinement at the White County Detention Center. The work left is defendant identification, amendment, discovery, and trial or settlement — not whether a claim can be stated. These cases are built on facts, logs, and hard proof, not he-said/she-said.

The dockets
Allegations only. What the Court allowed to proceed is on the orders. Beyond the three federal dockets below, White County Circuit case 73CV-26-287 is closed and on appeal, and a parallel claim before the Arkansas State Claims Commission has also survived screening.
Screened claims include deliberate indifference to serious medical needs (HIV / Biktarvy), legal-mail interference, failure to protect, excessive force, equal protection, and retaliation.
Screened April 10, 2026. Conditions claims against White County, Edwards, Ross, Swindle, and Does — sewage, floor-sleeping, overcrowding, food, hygiene, kiosk access, medical lockdown.
Religious-exercise §1983 / RLUIPA action. Denial of Bible, Catholic Mass, religious services, religious contact, and Catholic books while detained at White County Jail.